Leaves

Blog › With United leaving, experts peg Cleveland for high-speed rail

Blog

With United leaving, experts peg Cleveland for high-speed rail

Marc Lefkowitz  |  02/07/14 @ 3:00pm  |  Posted in Transportation choices

When United Airlines in dramatic fashion walked away from Cleveland and the city’s large investment—from infrastructure to the premium on tickets for “hub” bragging rights—many wondered, are we just the latest to pay the freight for a failing business model?

The larger issue may be, what other option do cities have? What does Cleveland do to shore up its economic position—the city still ranks 111th in GDP among cities worldwide— particularly for business travelers who no longer have United’s extensive regional flights?

Rail for the future<br />The Midwest High Speed Rail Association offers this vision for a network of high-speed trains linking the major and mid-tier cities including Cleveland.

Dream or reality?

Many participating in the civic dialogue think the answer lies in better passenger rail. Build a network of high-speed regional rail like Europe’s and the Midwest collectively might backfill the demand that United left on the table, rail experts insist.

“High-speed rail is a game changer,” says Kenneth Sislak, Associate Vice President at AECOM, the largest engineering firm in the world. Sislak is an economist and his focus is public transit systems. “Between Madrid and Sevilla, air travel had dominant market share. They built high speed rail and within three years practically no one was taking planes anymore.”

Advocates know from experience that passenger rail in Ohio is an uphill climb. The campaign to build a rail line connecting Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati was rebuffed by Ohio Governor Kasich when he sent $400 million in federal high speed rail money back.

But, with the airlines struggling, could Ohio have a role in helping its metros pivot to regional high speed rail?

We spoke to passenger rail experts about what it will take to build a modern, high-speed rail network such that a Clevelander could get to Chicago in 2.5 hours.

Depending on your perspective, you might see the estimated $27 billion it would take to connect Cleveland, Toledo, Detroit, Fort Wayne and Chicago with new tracks and trains equipped to speed an estimated 11 million annual passengers at 125 mph as an unattainable dream or powering a low-carbon economy.

That may sound like a lot, says Sislak, until you realize the massive public funding of air travel.

“I don’t think people realize how highly subsidized airlines are,” he says. “Airlines buy airplanes, and, it admittedly costs a lot. But, airports are all built by governments. They get landing fees. But, let’s talk about all the roads to get there. Who pays for TSA? Not the airlines. Same for air traffic control. The pool of pilots—who trains them? Mostly, the Air Force and Navy.”

Moving the switch

Well, then, if Ohio wanted to diversify its investment in transportation, where should it focus its efforts?

“The sweet spot for passenger rail, if you look at the data from Europe and Japan, is in those markets of 500 miles or less,” Sislak says. “The Chicago to Cleveland. It’s an anchor with lots of medium-sized feeder cities.”

“We are blessed in the northern tier of the U.S. because most cities grew up around the canal system then got replaced by railroads,” he adds. “Look at the string of pearls between New York and Chicago: Albany, Rochester, Syracuse, Buffalo, Cleveland, Toledo, Ft. Wayne -- all still strong population centers.”

United Airlines’ pull out of Cleveland underscores the shifting sands of their business model, says Sislak. Cleveland operated as a hub until fuel costs skyrocketed, making 50-passenger regional jets money losers. Killing them frees up capacity for more international flights, the real money makers. But it leaves a lot of people within 500 miles who connect through Cleveland in the lurch.

Passenger trains could fill the void in Cleveland while adding jobs, saving travelers money and time, and reducing our dependence on two of the worst producers of carbon emissions (airplanes and cars), says Rick Harnish, executive director of the Midwest High Speed Rail Association.

His group studied the economic impact of a Cleveland to Chicago high speed rail line, and estimated $693 million in benefits for the 9.6 million drivers and 1.2 million flyers. In particular, the 564,054 air travelers between Cleveland and Chicago would save $52.3 million annually from the difference in airfares (averaging $165) compared to a HSR ticket ($72). The study monetizes the time differential between high-speed trains and driving between the two cities at around $58 per trip.

How much of an improvement for the environment is passenger rail versus flying or driving? A study of European rail, and calculations such as Harvard economist Edward Glaeser's estimates that a 240-mile train in Texas would eliminate 113 pounds of carbon dioxide for each passenger per trip, support the premise that trains are the greenest option.

Baby steps or quantum leap?

But, with gridlock in Washington and an anti-transit sentiment in Columbus, how does passenger rail make in-roads?

“There’s this belief that we can’t take a quantum leap,” Harnish, a Cleveland native, says on a call from his office in Chicago. “But if you don’t have this long term vision, the initial steps are so hard.”

The initial steps, Harnish says, are improved “daylight” service for Amtrak between Cleveland and Chicago (and New York), meaning 5:30 a.m. not the current 3 a.m. departure.

It may take a similar effort to Save the Hub—with business leaders and Northeast Ohio’s Congressional delegation “leaning on” Amtrak to improve service, he adds. Business and government leaders might also start negotiating with freight rail carrier Norfolk-Southern for an 80-mph passenger train on a shared track.

Another important step will be rebuilding the rail station in Cleveland, he adds. It follows on what Harnish calls an asset-based approach.

“It’s time for Cleveland leadership to commit to building a true railroad station on the lakefront and connect it to the Mall not through a garage. Celebrate the fact that you have this lakefront and a rail line and passenger trains coming through there.”

Ironically, the airlines may be the biggest supporters of regional rail.

“Low-revenue regional flights cramp air capacity,” says Akshai Singh, recently Northeast Ohio Sierra Club’s Transportation Program Manager. “With sufficient investment in rail transport, not only will we have a lower-carbon option, but one that can alleviate congestion among major airports.”

Fall in to the gap

United’s decision to pull out of regional service to 34 cities directly from Cleveland leaves a void. Airline analysts say it will be partly filled by discount carriers like Jet Blue and Spirit, which have stayed out of the Cleveland market because of United. Cleveland Cliffs CEO this week on WCPN Sound of Ideas said that sounds encouraging, but worried aloud that business will continue to be affected until there’s stability in the regional transportation market.

“Will someone fill the void? Likely,” Sislak says. “It probably should be filled by more trains.”

All Aboard Ohio Executive Director Ken Prendergast agrees with Sislak that rail competes favorably on at least 18 of the routes that United nixed. Particularly, those within 500 miles of Cleveland such as Dayton, Ohio, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Loiusville, Kentucky and Parkersburg, West Virginia.

“While Americans are flying and driving less per capita due to rising costs and declining availability, they are taking buses and trains more. Especially for non-time-sensitive trips under 500 miles,” says Prendergast, adding that Amtrak currently serves only 5 of those 34 markets connecting Cleveland.

Sislak adds that Amtrak is at capacity for its Lakeshore Limited line which pulls 16 coach cars once a day from New York to Chicago (with a stop in Cleveland). He adds that a manufacturing recovery and world-class health care continue to make Cleveland a destination. Amtrak ridership in Cleveland-Elyria increased 16.2% from 1997 to 2012, according to a study by Brookings Institution.

“The pipeline on this northern railroad is pretty full of freight trains. There’s capacity. The freight rail lines don’t want to it give up. Plus it’s difficult to run passenger and freight on the same line.”

Another roadblock is a lack of vision in Ohio which has shunned requests for new passenger rail service. That leaves cities like Cleveland in an awkward position—surrounded by states that are pursuing rail projects

Prendergast suggests that Cleveland throw in with the states and metros in the Great Lakes. Both he and Harnish say that Cleveland can make overtures through its ownership of Hopkins Airport to beef up its regional transportation services.

“Shared, multi-modal passenger facilities combined with joint-ticketing agreements, such as what United does with Amtrak at Newark Liberty Airport, could help create a seamless transportation system between air, rail and bus services,” Prendergast says. “If ODOT continues to ignore our diversifying travel needs, Greater Cleveland's leaders should join with passenger rail development efforts supported by their colleagues in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania and New York. This is an important decision for Ohio in general and Cleveland in particular if it wishes to remain physically connected and economically relevant.”

  • Comments
    5
  • Print

Leave a comment »

Marc
3 years ago

New York State takes another step toward higher speed train service between New York City and Buffalo. New York's ambition would bring high speed rail within reach of Cleveland.
sfgate.com/news/article/NY-state-eyes-study-s-high-speed-rail-proposals-5241715.php

E. James
3 years ago

There has to be a generational change over in leadership. Baby Boomer politicians like John Kasich in their mid 60s will never, ever give up on funding the auto-centered infrastructure that has been such a quintessential part of their modern lives. As a group, they are far too stubborn and married to ideology about what is right for them being right for everyone, hence the endless culture wars all of us non-boomers are so sick of.

There's hope that Gens X, Y and Z will do what is necessary to rebuild our infrastructure, and that this will indeed include high speed rail, but if it takes another 2-3 election cycles to eliminate the boomer majority from state legislatures and Congress, we'll be that much further in the hole for it, and we will likely have to do triage just to keep the lights on in some cases. What's needed is an aggressive new pragmatism to face up to and force "non-governance by ideology" into retirement.

Exurbanist
3 years ago

What is All Aboard Ohio?

BTW, High-speed rail in Ohio should have been focused on enhancing service between Chicago and Cleveland and Cleveland and New York.

M.E. Singer
3 years ago

At some point, the folks in state government in Columbus will have to face the growing reality how their mandate for economic development will stagnate without mobility that is accessible, acceptable, and affordable.

Ohio towns have lost their connections to the cities as the local inter-city bus routes disappeared; as the airlines withdraw their short haul flights, leaving behind a minimal, infrequently scheduled, and expensive service. Only inter-city rail can serve Ohio's towns en route, as well as the end points of cities of all sizes, providing the requisite connection and mobility for economic growth.

Ironically, Ohio will have to re-invent the past, when passenger trains, before the advent of Federal subsidies for airlines and interstates, served all areas of Ohio, connecting Ohio to the region and throughout the nation.

Building rail is cheaper than interstate; operationally rail costs no more when all costs are fully allocated; especially when one mode is not subsidized over another. Despite such subsidies to the detriment of rail, look at how bus and air now abandon Ohio.

F.K. Plous
3 years ago

Many cities would love to have rail service replace missing feeder flights at a hub airport, but only Cleveland is ideally situated to do it: The tracks from Toledo, Dayton, Springfield, Columbus and Cincinnati go right by the front of the air terminal. It would cost Chicago at least $1 billion to bring railroad tracks up to the terminals at O'Hare and Midway. All Cleveland will need is a station, some escalators and a moving sidewalk into the terminal. Go for it.

Filter by RSS

Social media feed

Ten water saving tips

Ten water saving tips >

We're at the shore of Lake Erie, but we still have good reasons to conserve

Your location can cost or save

Your location can cost or save >

See if your neighborhood is costing or saving you more than the average

Find local food

Find local food >

Explore local food resources and a map of farmers markets in Northeast Ohio