Cleveland Mayor to 'jumpstart transformation' with sustainability

Diagram of Cleveland's proposed municipal solid waste to energy processIn his State of the City address last week, Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson detailed his plans to use sustainability as an economic engine, and a hoped for path out of poverty. Jackson—who convened 700 people to create a vision for a sustainable city last summer at the inaugural Sustainable Cleveland 2019 summit—started to spell out how he is implementing his green agenda.

Most notable from a green jobs standpoint, Jackson announced plans to bring Chinese LED-light manufacturer Sunpu-Opto’s American headquarters to Cleveland, which he expects to create up to 350 jobs. The business community usually define sustainability as producing economic, social, and environmental or ‘triple-bottom-line’ outcomes, and so the city has created a sustainable business model directing its municipal-owned utility, Cleveland Public Power, to be Sunpu-Opto’s first customer.

“The project would create an LED streetlight design for Cleveland, help reduce the City’s $12 million streetlight bill and help create a city-wide energy conservation program for homes and businesses,” the mayor said.

It is noteworthy that it took a Chinese manufacturer to get the deal done considering the Cleveland presence of GE Lighting and other LED makers, such as TCP in Aurora.

The city also looked to Asia for the technological backbone of its $180 million municipal solid waste to energy (MSWE) plant—and support services, including a renewed citywide recycling program and sorting facility—that it plans to build at its Ridge Road Waste Transfer Station. The waste gasification system that Princeton Environmental Group will design for Cleveland to burn trash into gas which can be captured to produce electricity in the form of steam and pellets was developed by Kinsei Sangyo in Japan, where landfill space is at a premium and thus burning solid waste has more economic impact.

“(It) has the potential to help Cleveland Public Power (CPP) reach its goal of 25% alternative energy sources by 2025; reduce the amount of waste going to our landfills; increase recycling; and, create a new profit center as the by-products of the process can be sold as fuel pellets and decorative bricks,” Jackson said.

Some criticism we’ve heard about the MSWE project include: Does the city’s cost-benefit analysis add up—should $110 million (less the recycling program and the decorative brick plant) get more bang for the buck on energy output than 120 megawatts of electricity? The city estimates that CPP will save $9.69 million annually on purchased power. But the triple bottom line benefits add up. Natural areas and biodiversity will be preserved from not building another landfill. Even if it costs the waste industry less to dump trash Ohio, Cleveland expects to reduce significantly its yearly $9.4 million cost to landfill trash. And the city anticipates creating jobs for plant operation and spin off businesses. For example, a byproduct of gasification are fuel pellets and feedstock for decorative bricks (the city plans to invest $8 million in a decorative brick operation).

Another concern local environmental groups have shared is the plant’s impact on air quality. The region is already in a federally designated ‘non-attainment’ status for air quality, and environmentalists wonder about the impact, despite claims from the mayor that “once the facility is designed, we will work to obtain the air permit from the Ohio EPA to continue moving forward.” Does the city need to produce more analysis on the environmental benefits of gasifying rather than hauling 40 miles and burying 3,000 tons of trash per day?

Back to the mayor’s sustainability commitments in his speech. They include:

Cleveland City Council is considering new policy that would leverage its buying power to promote locally grown food and sustainable businesses. Ordinance No. 1660-A-09 was introduced by Mayor Frank Jackson and Councilmember Joe Cimperman in January to provide bid incentives on city contracts for local businesses, sustainable businesses and businesses that purchase local foods. Read more.

A major lens for economic, social and environmental work will be in the continuation of the Sustainable Cleveland 2019 summit (a second summit is being planned for September, 2010). The mayor mentioned that the city is paying for a strategic plan for sustainable development that ties in the work of a volunteer army from the 2019 Work Groups.

What is brave about the mayor's State of the City address is an acknowledgement of the hard financial times for Cleveland, and yet, without skipping a beat, his answer is to get the city on the right track through sustainability, efficiency, a renewed focus on education and inviting innovative ideas. Or as he said in closing:

If we fail to act on creating educational excellence throughout the county, on changing how local and county governments operate to become more efficient and effective in delivering service, on transforming our economy into a sustainable economy by 2019, on investing in our neighborhoods and residents to ensure quality of life and safety; and, on continuing fiscally stability and reducing the cost of government, we will have squandered the greatest opportunity this community has seen in decades to reinvent itself as a thriving city and county for generations to come.”

Read Mayor Jackson's 2010 State of the City address here.

January 11, 2011 - 10:50am

another view of the Municipal Solid Waste to Energy plan

Susan Miller Says:
From my inbox and for our consideration: A truly sustainable solution? This is the counter argument. Dear Cleveland area friends,

For over a year now, there have been talk about building what would be a toxic, polluting trash incinerator in Cleveland.  News of it has been quiet for months, but we'd like to work with you to help ensure that this bad idea goes nowhere.

Please RSVP if you can join us for a conference call to discuss it.  RSVP here, listing what times work best for you: http://www.doodle.com/z9tyn5zaymk88rmh

Read on for more information:

Cleveland has sunk $1.5 million into a dirty energy proposal.  Cleveland is paying a New Jersey based company, Princeton Environmental Group (don't let the name fool you), to design a so-called "power plant" fueled by municipal waste.  The trash incinerator will burn 2,000 tons of waste per day according to Princeton Group (PEG).  The incinerator will be located at the Ridge Road Transfer Station, located near 71 and the Stockyards.

With the new incinerator proposed in Cleveland, we need to send a clear and strong message to dirty energy polluters: Ohio wants a clean future.  Energy Justice Network would like to host a conference call among allies to discuss what can be done to prevent the building of this trash incinerating monstrosity.

We would really appreciate if you could RSVP for the call, as it will help us figure out a good time for all of us.  If you will click on the http://www.doodle.com/z9tyn5zaymk88rmh it will take you to a site, Doodle, where you can help schedule the conference call by clicking on the time that works best for you.  I would also encourage you to keep reading, for more information about the incinerator, and check out the links in the body, and those provided below, for even more information.

In addition to building the waste incinerator, Cleveland has been courting PEG (Princeton Energy Group) to relocate within the city, to build a new headquarters and a manufacturing plant that would produce gasification-type incinerators to peddle to other communities.  The $1.5 million will go to the Princeton Environmental Group, which will be responsible for designing the power plant and employing its gasification technology.  The city of Cleveland will receive assistance from the Cleveland Foundation, American Municipal Power and the American Public Power Association to pay the $1.5 million contract with Princeton.  The whole project would cost about $200 million and only produce a 350 megawatt peak load.

There are numerous issues at stake.  First, there is the financial concern that a new incinerator could put Cleveland into financial ruin and massive debt, as incinerators have in Harrisburg, PA, Claremont, NH, Camden, NJ and numerous other locations.  Besides the financial risk to the stability of Cleveland's economy, there have been serious questions about the integrity of the man behind Princeton Environmental Group.  Its owner, Peter Tien, facilitated a meeting between City Council and a Chinese lighting company that has now emerged as a part-owner of PEG's North American operations.  According to councilman Jay Westbrook, "The guy on one day is an adviser and the next day is the principal beneficiary....  That is a classic conflict of interest." And, of course, there are all the classic dangers of incineration to worry about too, like  emissions of dioxins and furans, the most toxic group of chemicals known to science -- mainly emitted by incinerators, including the gasification kind proposed here.  Besides spreading cancer, incineration brings other human health risks: destruction of local ecological balance, negative water impacts, economic impacts, etc..

In Ohio, we know that these risks are nothing to mess with.  Dioxin and other toxic and hazardous chemicals are not what we want to breathe as we take big gulps of Ohio air.  Since 1994, when Columbus closed the nation's most polluting trash incinerator, Ohio communities have refused to believe the lie that incineration is renewable.  In large part this is because of people like you, who were active and vocal.

So please don't forget get active and vocal, RSVP for our conference call by clicking on the http://www.doodle.com/z9tyn5zaymk88rmh.  If you have any other comments, questions, or concerns, please send them our way.

Also below I have included a list of helpful links, most of which are embedded in the text as well.   I would especially recommend checking out all the information we have about incineration on our website.  And our mapping feature where you can see what other dirty energy sites are in your area.

Hope to hear from you all soon, and have a nice evening. 

Best Regards,

Mike Ewall, Director
Energy Justice Network
215-436-9511
catalyst@actionpa.org
http://www.energyjustice.net

Ljubica Sarafov, Campus / Community Organizer
Energy Justice Network
979-450-4009
ljubica@energyjustice.net
http://www.energyjustice.net

Links for More Information:

http://www.energyjustice.net/incineration - see bottom of this page for documentation of the fact that gasification is a type of incineration, and see the gasification section for links to reports, like the "Industry Blowing Smoke" report on the environmental problems with gasification-style trash incinerators

http://www.energyjustice.net/map/displayfacility-74591.htm - our mapping project's profile on the proposed incinerator, with links to further articles

http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2010/02/cleveland_signs_agreement_to_b.html - Cleveland incinerator proposal agreement

http://www.advfn.com/news_2ndUPDATE-Covanta-Sues-Harrisburg-Over-1-9-Million-In-Missed-Payments_44669140.html - Harrisburg, PA incinerator debt crisis

http://earth911.com/news/2010/02/16/cleveland-waste-to-energy-power-plan...
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20101130-712036.html
http://www.energyjustice.net/map/displayfacility-74591.htm
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/05/cleveland_council_members_wond.html
http://www.ejnet.org/dioxin/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.