How to green the stimulus package

Submitted by Marc Lefkowitz  |  Last edited February 27, 2009 - 1:12pm
»

From completestreets.orgOhio wants to hear from you how it should invest the $1.2 billion it will receive from the economic stimulus package. recovery.ohio.gov is more than a searchable database of all the requests for stimulus funds. It is a fascinating look at the ambitions of more than 7,000 people, some working hard to make a case for transformational change.

Arguably too many are mundane requests from cities looking to repave roads. But plenty of Northeast Ohioans are hoping to invest the funds in a sustainable transportation system, a green product and a renewable energy business idea. The site has hundreds of companies holding out their hat for tens of millions of dollars: Pierre’s Ice Cream dreams of building a $7 million state-of-the-art facility in Midtown Cleveland. Product designers Nottingham Spirk want $8 million to manufacture an ‘eco bottle’.

Budding entrepreneurs want a crack at that money, too. Mary Jo Chrobak of Hudson would like $2 million for “Propogating, planting and harvesting miscanthus gigantus (a grass) for the purposes of producing renewable energy source.”

The vast majority of the requests are for infrastructure. Leading the way is ODOT’s request for $365 million to rebuild the Innerbelt Bridge. What’s so green about that? Well, it might be a good idea to revisit the conversation about designing a bike path on the bridge now that we have a new ODOT administration (GCBL posted quite a bit about this idea here.)

Fairly typical is an $11 million request to replace pavement and curbs on 20 local streets in Strongsville. How can we green mundane infrastructure requests? Before the state approves infrastructure funds, they ought to be filtered through ODOT’s new Transportation Priorities for the 21st century task force recommendations. Sustainable transportation advocates insist the state needs to pass a Complete Streets policy which would ensure that all funding for infrastructure includes designs for bike lanes, pedestrian zones, and transit amenities. Then, when Strongsville needs new roads, they’re re-built for the 21st century realities of climate change and the day that oil runs out. Just like a Renewable Portfolio Standard promised a renewable energy market for Ohio, a Complete Streets policy will jump start the investment in safer roads not too mention roads that offer choices for parents feeling safe riding a bicycle with their kids to school and then to work.

Cleveland's request to the state for 2009 Economic Recovery Act funds does include the following bicycle-related projects: the Downtown Bike Station, Train Avenue Bikeway, Lake to Lakes Trail, Kerruish Park Trail, Dike 14 Trail and Towpath Trail.

Part of Cleveland’s shovel ready list for stimulus funds includes projects that tie in bike facilities, like a proposed bike parking station in University Circle. The city ranks that as ready to go within 120 days, however, the location and plans to develop the station as part of a large mixed-use development on Mayfield Road (at Lot 45) are still in their infancy.

But, most noticeable in its absence from the list on recovery.ohio.gov are direct funding requests for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout Cuyahoga County.

“It seems the local/regional cycling community is missing a huge opportunity to fund regional infrastructure projects like lanes, paths, signage and bicycle parking,” says John McGovern, Clean Transportation Program Coordinator, DOE Clean Cities Program, Earth Day Coalition.

Sally Hanley, a staffer at the region’s transportation planning agency, NOACA, answers that they submitted projects through their usual channel at the state department of transportation. “This list does include the part of the Towpath Trail from Harvard to the Steelyard Commons. It also includes many road and bridge projects that the BAC (Bike Advisory Council) has reviewed and made recommendations for.”

What about education, McGovern continues, how about a regional campaign to highlight NOACA bicycle buddies and get folks out of their cars and onto bicycles and transit? “As I understand it, several hundred thousand dollars have been secured through the Federal Stimulus Package to educate fleets and citizens about idle reduction. In terms of saving fuel and reducing carbon, moving trips to bikes has the same effect!”

What green building, alternative transportation and renewable energy projects would you like to see stimulus funds invested in? Add your ideas here.

March 13, 2009 - 2:09pm

Smart growth - is it in the Fed stimulus?

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

The Congress for New Urbanism critiques the Recovery Act’s transportation investments, and wishes it had a stronger urban recovery agenda. A key element in New Urbanist and pedestrian-oriented planning won’t get attention because Congress didn’t tie new transportation spending to densely connected street networks. No ‘fix-it-first’ policy means much of the highway money may go toward building new roads and expanding existing ones rather than repairing older streets and roads that have deteriorated.

“In terms of cutting-edge, breakthrough stuff — it was hard to find,” said Robert Yaro, president of the Regional Plan Association in New York and co-chair of America 2050, a national strategy group for economic development and infrastructure.

On the bright side:

  • Of $27.5 billion allocated for road modernization, 3 percent ($825 million) must be used by the states to create “transportation enhancements.” (Ohio is expected to get $56 million). These may include such things as walkways, bike paths, and bike lanes or Active Living by Design Safe Routes to School projects.
  • Compared to the 2005 federal transportation act known as SAFETEA-LU, the stimulus package nearly doubles the portion of “highway” funds going to bike and pedestrian projects. Bicycle advocates, especially, fought to make sure that the states were required to put a set portion of the stimulus funds into transportation enhancements.
  • The stimulus also sends a greater portion of such money to cities. The fact that metropolitan areas with more than 200,000 residents will receive 16 percent of the highway money was welcomed by urbanists. “This funding will go to agencies that, compared to state DOTs, are more likely to invest in progressive transportation projects,” Ben Fried wrote in a commentary at Streetsblog.org.

Of $1.5 billion will be awarded in competitive grants to state and local governments for transportation investments. These, too, can include non-highway alternatives. As transportation option advocates, it will be important to follow the money and see that requests are submitted to ODOT and NOACA to fully fund bike and pedestrian improvement projects from our share of transportation enhancement funds. It will also be worthwhile to encourage ideas to tap Ohio’s share of competitive grants for transportation investments.

Ohio could double down on its investments with a Complete Streets policy – ensuring that street repair requests that are coming from Solon and Strongsville are enhanced street environments (Sharrows, bike lanes, street calming – see this link for images)

Complete streets need to include best available technologies. If we want people to take the bus, ride a bike or walk, then as a community we must demand that the best existing technology and practices be integrated into
Northeast Ohio’s roadways and intersections to create a safe environment that promotes all modes of transportation.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.