A still more glorious dawn awaits.

ReImagine a Greater Cleveland
Issues of vacancy, abandonment and foreclosure have had a profound effect on the well-being of the nation's neighborhoods and residents. These negative forces have mobilized community development professionals and policymakers in Cleveland to develop innovative efforts to turn the tide and fight for our neighborhoods.
[read more]
GreenCityBlueLake is the online home for the exciting people, projects, and ideas creating a more sustainable future in Northeast Ohio. Find out how you can make a donation or become a sponsor of the site.
Plain Dealer associate editor Joe Frolik doubts that setting up different tax abatement terms based on the health of a neighborhood's market can survive the politics it would take to get it done.
Trying to re-tool Cleveland's system now that its been running in order to target areas or reduce the level of abatement may be difficult, but certainly not impossible. Many cities have target areas or designated zones for tax abatements or a sliding scale of years.
In Cleveland, neighborhoods like Ohio City, where north of Lorain Avenue and east of W. 45th the average home price approaches $150,000 and south of Lorain is far below that, could be a test market for Enterprise Zones. Setting a standard based on hitting a ceiling in value may be more insulated from politics because no one area is branded a loser.
Questions to be explored:
Resources:
This site is inspired by the memory of Richard Shatten, a former board member of EcoCity Cleveland,
who pushed Northeast Ohio to think strategically about regionalism and sustainability.
A service of the GreenCityBlueLake Institute at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History.
Operating support provided by The George Gund Foundation.
The GreenCityBlueLake name and logo are registered service marks of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History.

Unless otherwise indicated, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License.
GreenCityBlueLake
2006-2008
GreenCityBlueLake is proudly powered by Drupal.
More not less abatements
Tom Bier Says:In December 2001, we surveyed buyers of new homes and asked: "How important is property tax abatement for the success of new housing?" 92% said "very important", 7% said "modestly important" and 1% said "slightly or not important."
My view is that without the abatement that has been available for the past 15 years, little would have happened.
Cleveland was an extremely weak housing market, and I believe it is still very weak. Most of the city's neighborhoods are unstable. Good suburban options are easily available.
All of this is the consequence of a weak regional economy which results in little regional population growth. In the context of the region, there is very little middle class demand to live in Cleveland (and the inner suburbs as well).
As long as the region and consequently
Cleveland are so weak, the city must use tax abatement to compensate for that weakness. The inner suburbs are finding out they are in the same boat. The suburban outward movement to the adjacent counties is massive. How will the inner suburbs combat that? More tax abatement.
Mayor Jackson proposes strategic tax abatements
Marc Lefkowitz Says:From the Plain Dealer:
Cleveland Mayor Frank Jackson wants City Council to revise the residential tax abatements from 15 years to seven on most houses built in the city.
Jackson also proposes 12-year tax breaks for houses built with environmentally friendly designs and for houses with features for senior citizens.
The thinking behind this seems solid: reduce the homeownership costs for Clevelanders, who lead the nation in home foreclosures because they cannot afford to live in a home. I'm surprised at Matt Zone's reaction. He supports energy efficiency for new townhomes, but not for older homes and less well off home owners who need it most? Instead of poo poohing the idea, let's cheer the possibility that abatements can respond to strategic goals. And direct homeowners to the county's low-interest home loan program for improvements. Maybe Cleveland City Council could see it as an opportunity to follow Shaker Heights' lead and launch a Go Green program offering energy efficiency home improvement grants?
Roldo takes the Plain Dealer's outright rejection of the Jackson proposal to task, citing a lack of balanced coverage of the stats from the CSU study, including:
"It does not mention that 26 of the abated units are worth more than $1 million each. No taxes for someone who can afford $1-million plus housing in a city where numerous homeowners have and are losing their homes in foreclosures.
And, "In fact, 20 percent of the tax-abated units have been lost to foreclosures, according to the CSU report. That’s a fifth of these abated units."