Look at the trees, look at the birds, look at the clouds, look at the stars...and if you have eyes you will be able to see that the whole existence is joyful. Everything is simply happy. Trees are happy for no reason; they are not going to become prime ministers or presidents and they are not going to become rich and they will never have any bank balance. Look at the flowers -- for no reason. It is simply unbelievable how happy flowers are.










biofuel controversy
Susan Miller Says:You may have heard this NPR story Blazing a Trail for Alterntive Fuels. Corn prices are up and farmers are growing corn on land that might have been in conservation status to make the cash. So you might also want to listen to this Marketplace Report: Diesel Fuel and this Environmentalists Oppose More Corn Crops and this Is U.S. Energy Independence a Pipe Dream?
What are the feedstocks preferable for biofuels?
I am convinced by reading Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma that corn is not the answer. I like my Gulf of Mexico without the dead zone caused by nitrate runoff.
The ethanol dilemma
Marc Lefkowitz Says:The front page of the Business section of today's PD has an interview with Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, who argues against ethanol and for a 20% increase in U.S. fuel-efficiency requirements, plug-in hybrids and wind energy. Brown finds it "fascinating" that federal policy makers can't see the food problems that corn-based ethanol will create.
I have to agree with Mr. Brown—ethanol is a stop-gap, and not a very good fitting one in my opinion. Energy efficiency, and plug in hybrid electric vehicles (the tech is there, but development is a few years down the line) and even biomass and wind as an energy source is arguably better in terms of the energy balance and thus use of scarce resources. I would add transit-oriented development as a policy of government or at least heavily subsidized to the list.
more ethanol or less fuel?
David Slawson Says:Thank you, Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute for pointing out a fatal flaw in the rush to produce more ethanol -- the impact it will have on US and world food prices (see today's PD article on p. C-1). It seems our business and political leaders' knee jerk reaction is to look to the spigot (supply) rather than the plug (efficiency) in solving our energy problems -- to use my "tub and plug" analogy (when water won't stay in the tub, I think most of us would fix the plug rather than turn up the volume of water). Can anyone hazard a guess as to why we treat energy problems so differently from our household appliances?
conserve, preserve, reserve -- serve
Susan Miller Says:Wouldn’t you know -- it is the conservatives who don’t get conservation? I’ve always thought it curious that conservative measures in regard to the environment do not seem to go hand in hand with conservatism. What blows my mind is that since we live next to the Great Lakes, the idea of conserving water is totally outside our lexicon -- off our radar -- like fresh water is this endless resource.
By the way, one has only to read through a food book -- The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan to get that corn is not the answer. How did we wind up with these backward ag policies that do not serve the farmer or the consumer or national security?
Portland requires renewable fuels
Marc Lefkowitz Says:The City of Portland is the first city in the country to pass a local renewable fuels standard. The Portland City Council voted July 12, 2006 to approve a citywide renewable fuels standard requiring a minimum 5% blend of biodiesel and for gasoline to contain 10% ethanol for all motor vehicle fuel within the City limits. The standard went into effect July 1, 2007.
The Portland RFS alone expands the annual market for biodiesel in Oregon from four million to eight million gallons per year. For more information on the Portland RFS, go here.
And The State of Oregon agreed to run the inspection program for Portland’s biofuels.