Ethanol and E85 fuel

Posted in:

Ethanol fuel is an alternative to gasoline. It can be combined with gasoline in any concentration up to pure ethanol (E100) to reduce consumption of petroleum fuels and reduce air pollution.

Ethanol can be mass-produced by fermentation of sugar or by hydration of ethylene from petroleum and other sources. More than 90 percent of the ethanol produced in the U.S. comes from corn.

Ethanol capabilities vary widely and current ethanol engines are mildly modified gasoline engines with a few adjustments required to overcome the corrosive effect of the alcohol content of the ethanol fuel.

In 1990, Congress required that gasoline contain a 10 percent additive to control smog. All current (2006) production spark ignition vehicles in the U.S. are designed to be compatible with up to 10 percent ethanol. To change a pure-gasoline-fueled car into a pure-ethanol-fueled car, larger carburetor jets or fuel injectors are needed.

In 2004, around 42 billion liters of ethanol were produced in the world. Around 12.4 billion liters were produced as fuel to ethanol-powered vehicles in domestic market. Top domestic research fields are already producing 11,500 gallons of ethanol per acre.

E85
E85 is a blend of ethanol and gasoline (85 percent ethanol). Flexible Fuel Vehicles (FFVs) are specifically designed to run on E85 are becoming more common and are available with little or no incremental cost. The FFVs can operate on gasoline as well as E85.

Benefits
Ethanol is most commonly used to increase octane and improve the emissions quality of gasoline but there are other benefits.

  • Ethanol equipment is only slightly different and similar in cost to the petroleum fuel equipment that in some cases can be converted.
  • Ethanol emits less carbon monoxide
  • Ethanol is a particulate-free burning fuel source that combusts cleanly with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water

Efficiency
A comparison of petroleum diesel and petroleum gasoline found that petroleum diesel has a 0.843 energy yield, petroleum gasoline has a 0.805 energy yield, while bioethanol has a yield of 1.34.

Ethanol consumption in an engine is approximately 34 percent higher than that of gasoline (the BTUs per gallon are 34 percent lower), but higher compression ratios in an ethanol-only engine allow for increased power output.

Controversy
Much of the research in the U.S. regarding ethanol involves the use of corn. This poses a number of questions having to do with sustainability, availability and price. At best, corn could satisfy about half of demand – and that ignores the general impact on food and feedstock prices. As of 2006, global ethanol production is primarily from sugar cane, maize (corn) and sugar beets.

Some economists have argued that using ethanol as a petroleum substitute is economically infeasible (and environmentally inappropriate) because the energy required to grow and process the corn used as fuel is greater than the amount ultimately produced.

They argue that government programs that mandate the use of bioalcohol are agricultural subsidies. The U. S. Department of Energy, however, finds that for every unit of energy put towards ethanol production, 1.3 units are returned. Another study found that corn-grain ethanol produced 1.25 units of energy per unit.

Cellulosic ethanol—a technique for making ethanol out of agricultural residues, wood waste and non-food corps such as switchgrass, instead of from the starches of corn, wheat and similar grains. This process doesn't impact food supply or prices, requires less energy to produce and doesn’t involve controversial subsidies. Still in research phase, with development being tested and production considered a few years off.

Grants/tax incentives/funding

Federal – Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides a tax credit to buyers of new alternative fuel vehicles placed in service as an alternative fuel vehicle after January 1, 2006.

State - The Alternative Fuel Transportation Grant Program authorizes $900,000 for the purchase and installation of alternative fuel refueling and blending facilities, and for the purchase and use of alternative fuel by businesses, nonprofit organizations, public school systems, and local governments.

January 29, 2007 - 9:28pm

biofuel controversy

Susan Miller Says:

You may have heard this NPR story Blazing a Trail for Alterntive Fuels. Corn prices are up and farmers are growing corn on land that might have been in conservation status to make the cash. So you might also want to listen to this Marketplace Report: Diesel Fuel and this Environmentalists Oppose More Corn Crops and this Is U.S. Energy Independence a Pipe Dream?

What are the feedstocks preferable for biofuels?

I am convinced by reading Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma that corn is not the answer. I like my Gulf of Mexico without the dead zone caused by nitrate runoff.

March 22, 2007 - 1:35pm

The ethanol dilemma

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

The front page of the Business section of today's PD has an interview with Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, who argues against ethanol and for a 20% increase in U.S. fuel-efficiency requirements, plug-in hybrids and wind energy. Brown finds it "fascinating" that federal policy makers can't see the food problems that corn-based ethanol will create.

I have to agree with Mr. Brown—ethanol is a stop-gap, and not a very good fitting one in my opinion. Energy efficiency, and plug in hybrid electric vehicles (the tech is there, but development is a few years down the line) and even biomass and wind as an energy source is arguably better in terms of the energy balance and thus use of scarce resources. I would add transit-oriented development as a policy of government or at least heavily subsidized to the list.

March 22, 2007 - 8:27pm

more ethanol or less fuel?

David Slawson Says:

Thank you, Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute for pointing out a fatal flaw in the rush to produce more ethanol -- the impact it will have on US and world food prices (see today's PD article on p. C-1). It seems our business and political leaders' knee jerk reaction is to look to the spigot (supply) rather than the plug (efficiency) in solving our energy problems -- to use my "tub and plug" analogy (when water won't stay in the tub, I think most of us would fix the plug rather than turn up the volume of water). Can anyone hazard a guess as to why we treat energy problems so differently from our household appliances? 

March 22, 2007 - 11:21pm

conserve, preserve, reserve -- serve

Susan Miller Says:

Wouldn’t you know -- it is the conservatives who don’t get conservation? I’ve always thought it curious that conservative measures in regard to the environment do not seem to go hand in hand with conservatism. What blows my mind is that since we live next to the Great Lakes, the idea of conserving water is totally outside our lexicon -- off our radar -- like fresh water is this endless resource.

By the way, one has only to read through a food book -- The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan to get that corn is not the answer. How did we wind up with these backward ag policies that do not serve the farmer or the consumer or national security?

August 2, 2007 - 3:48pm

Portland requires renewable fuels

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

The City of Portland is the first city in the country to pass a local renewable fuels standard. The Portland City Council voted July 12, 2006 to approve a citywide renewable fuels standard requiring a minimum 5% blend of biodiesel and for gasoline to contain 10% ethanol for all motor vehicle fuel within the City limits. The standard went into effect July 1, 2007.

The Portland RFS alone expands the annual market for biodiesel in Oregon from four million to eight million gallons per year. For more information on the Portland RFS, go here.

And The State of Oregon agreed to run the inspection program for Portland’s biofuels.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.