Like its culinary counterpart, the McMansion provides excellent value for its price. American homebuilders are perhaps the best in the world when it comes to providing buyers with the private realm. The problem is that most suburban residents, the minute they leave this refuge, are confronted by a tawdry and stressful environment. Americans may have the finest private realm in the developed world, but our public realm is brutal.










an opportunity to consider
Susan Miller Says:I have been prompted by my college freshman son who came home last night looking for info on Brownfields to look again at the Opportunity Corridor map that ODOT has posted. I then looked for a Brownfield map and then back at the County Greenprint (my favorite of all these images). I spoke with Marc, and he reminded me of the southern rail bypass idea.
It seems it might be prudent or at least interesting to see an overlay of all these possibilities for that area of the city. If we were able to see how these plans and ideas interface (or don’t), we might have more data with which to make informed decisions. Not that I get to make any of them. It would further be interesting to see what wards, what CDCs or other governmental layers intersect with these parcels. If some party owns a particular right of way, has a development plan for it underway, what the zoning for certain parcels or chunks of land is, etc.
I am very skeptical of more pavement and high speed roads through neighborhoods. I do not trust that they will bring economic development to the by way. I doubt if any clinic doc rushing to the hospital or Case prof will be lingering at the intersection of E79th and the highway for a mochaccino. But maybe I am wrong.
I traveled the area yesterday from E89 along Quincy to Playhouse Square – not bad (though the road could use resurfacing in some areas). Coming back to the Heights, I traveled Woodland. Woodland is beautiful in the areas around the cemeteries and St. Hermon’s. There is some new housing across the street there which is hideous and some commercial property further east that is an eyesore, but for the most part, developing the open parcels along these existing thoroughfares seems like it might be more cost effective than building another highway through what could be a green corridor. I have read that juvy has plans for the 93rd and Quincy and 93rd and Folsom parcels. Are there others?
My version of an opportunity to get to the clinic from 490 and 55th is slower, greener and has more street frontage retail and residential. It is tree lined and interspersed with parkland. It would have bike lanes and sidewalk wifi café’s. OK, dream on you’re thinking, but why not a different version (a more populated version) of the showplace now traveled by folks coming to the circle (Innerbelt and Shoreway to MLK greenway)?
Look at these maps side by side: http://www.innerbelt.org/OpportunityCorridor/OC-ProjectOverview.pdf, http://cpc.cuyahogacounty.us/docs/green/grid08.pdf, http://www.ecocitycleveland.org/ecologicaldesign/blue/rail_bypass_map.html
I am hindered by switching between Google maps hybrid, and the above separate plan maps. I am not trained in GIS mapping, but have poked around in the county Brownfield GIS with addresses along that corridor.
Perhaps this composite already exists in someone’s sophisticated GIS mapping. If so, could you direct us to that online resource? If not, can it be done? If it can, who would do it? If done, how could interested parties utilize it? How about a charette called “remembered plans for the forgotten triangle”? Sometimes it is just hard for a lone taxpayer to envision the big picture. What do the forgotten people who live there want? Did the folks along 1-90 on the west side want that highway in their backyards? What effect did it have on property values there when it was built?
Given today’s government, the costs (both monetary and environmental) associated with highway building; the many considerations that need to be applied, it is increasingly difficult to just sit back and trust that things will be fine.
These are my questions today. I hope one of you will reply next week with the “oh duh, it right here” solution I have overlooked.
Opportunity Corridor needs careful study
Marc Lefkowitz Says:Below is the reply from Steve Rugare of the Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative:
We did have a student look at a true parkway concept for the corridor last year. She did do some useful GIS mapping of the sort you’re talking about, and I could probably retrieve that. In the meantime, here are a few points to consider:
1) It’s unlikely that the route could perform as required and be a street with meaningful frontage development. It is, fundamentally, a bypass/truck route and (according to ODOT) has to be engineered in a way (truck turning radii, lane widths) that is not going to make it an attractive site for residential or storefront development (even if there were development pressures in the neighborhood). The question is whether it will (further) blight the surroundings. Can it be a greenway or parkway with industrial and service employers who need road access and ample parking?
2) For similar reasons, a rail alternative might not make sense. The clinic-related economic development envisioned along the corridor is not retail services for the commuters. It’s back office and support functions for the hospitals (laundries, call centers, data processing, medical waste processing) that could happen on lower-value, off-site land AND potentially employ people from places like the Forgotten Triangle. So we’re talking about big, faceless single story buildings with loading docks. They need good truck access and parking for employees. Is it a viable vision? We’d need to study that, as it’s the only justification for ramming this thing through a part of the city that has been mistreated too much already. I’m pretty sure that it is a more realistic and actually progressive vision for places like Ward 5 and Union-Miles than doing a charrette that produces yet more pretty New Urbanism that will simply stay on paper.
3) Given the volume of vacant or tax delinquent property in the vicinity of the proposed route, how do we convince ODOT to think beyond the near term and beyond the edge of the pavement. Beyond near term meaning, for example, leaving right-of-way for a future rail option or leaving open space that could become part of a future landscape-based stormwater management system. Beyond the pavement meaning at minimum, very careful attention to crossings, intersections, trail networks and connections to the surrounding fabric. (They haven’t done very well on these counts with the west shoreway, so one can only shudder to think what they might perpetrate in this part of town.)
opportunity to plan
Susan Miller Says:Wouldn't a master plan for the corridor in question be better? If there is one, doesn’t this have to be part and parcel of it? What, we plan and then throw away the parts that the highway blasts through while maintaining everything else? I guess I just don’t get planning, never mind master planning when something this huge is not addressed as part of that plan.
I hope that with the announcement of county sustainability we will see the county saying – "You must provide stormwater management, no ifs ands or buts." I know I know, home rule, no green building codes. But, hey, what about the guy who just got elected as Lt. Governor whose agency serves those poor people? What does he think of blighting more urban neighborhoods with oversized Sears backyard sheds with truck bays?
What causes for safety and security concerns does this pose for the people traversing the area or living in it? Long stretches of block-long buildings with no windows does not a safe neighborhood make. I think that is Jane Jacobs 101. If I lived in the neighborhood, I might prefer land based wind turbines surrounded by green space, but I guess this might impair the view for those living in the big houses along the portage escarpment.
Either way, a frank discussion is needed. We see what the engine of ODOT gone wild can perpetrate, has perpetrated. People are supporting this because it has a nice name – “opportunity”. My pointed question is opportunity for whom? Show me the money – the money going out and coming in. Who sows and who reaps?
When talking about this corridor at a recent public meeting, John Motl (ODOT District 12) is paraphrased as saying “this is an opportunity to spend $____” (I can't remember the amount) and “the city owns most of the land already, so we may as well build a road through there – nothing else is happening there anyway.” I suggest we propose what could happen there instead of a freeway. Just my 2 cents. First off we need to see that mapping. If it disrupts cemeteries and or St. Hermon’s there could be a hue and cry. I just can’t see it right now to know whether or not to hue or to cry…
"Opportunity" to pave another piece of land
amycorson Says:This conversation ended last year, around the same time I had stopped researching the proposed corridor, but now I think it is time to start paying attention, again. I read this PD article pushing for it.
First, Who is this being built for? Not the people who live in this community. These people have commuters traveling through their neighborhoods on Woodland and Kinsman now, and it is not bringing them any econmomic development. Busy roads degrade the surrounding properties in Cleveland - look at: Pearl Rd, Brookpark Rd, Cedar Rd. Ask real estate agents, they know it is true. I wonder if the people working on these plans know one single human that lives in the area they are discussing the future of. Asthma rates are rising in urban communities and we want to trap them with more single-vehicle transportation. How is that for environmental justice!
Second, there is clearly a mode of transportation between the 55th Exit and University Circle and it is the train tracks. What about connecting the green-blue line to the red line with a light rail on this "oppurtunity corridor". Light rails can be very useful to low-income families for commuting and encourage high density housing. Lastly, these are some of the largest parcels of under-used lands in Cleveland. For more than a decade, I have been imagining the potential of this area. Pouring cement over this land caps over all the economic and community potential that could be propigated on these lands.
remember the triangle - forget the "opportunity corridor"
Susan Miller Says:Right on Amy. Take a look at this as an option that is being planned for the "forgotten triangle" area.
I also suggest that the escarpment south of Cleveland Heights and Shaker along E93rd street could become a place for very high-end pied a terre estates (gated with live security and razor-wire topped fences, of course) for the very rich. I mean, after all, with the amount of culture that is in the city, many late nights will one day not lend themselves to driving all the way home to MOREland Hills. Great views of the city from here. Put those young architects to work designing something awesome! This would be what we call "mixed income development".
One challenge is the northeast flow of Mittal's plume. With prevailing winds in our region coming from the south southwest this triangle may have been forgotten because of the intense air quality issues there. Just guessing.
Please post your good ideas and vision. Check out the Ward 5 plan linked in the post above and note that it ignores the "opportunity" corridor and Brent Larkin. There's plenty of frank discussion on this at realneo.
Opportunity for affordable, green TOD housing?
Marc Lefkowitz Says:Thanks Susan for sharing Jeff Buster's comments on RealNeo that we need to evaluate the cost-benefits of "opportunity corridor" with the neighborhood in mind. Yes, the Clinic and University Hospital stand to gain greater access, but what about the residents of Ward 5, will a road in and of itself offer opportunity?
I also enjoyed reading Jeff's ideas that the boulevard could bring opportunity to invest in affordable, green housing, as a lab for new 'radical' designs within walking distance of transit.
I think the corridor could benefit from a planning process that identifies the ˜synergies" in land-use and transportation plans for Opportunity Corridor, the county's Greenprint map, and even RTA's TOD desires and the Norfolk Southern lakefront bypass study.
Opportunities Abound
curatorius Says:Would building the Opportunity Corridor leave service on the eastern half of the GCRTA Red Line intact? The Red Line now provides seamless one-seat service from University Circle to Hopkins, which would not be true of a Silver Line/Red Line combination.
Is there any way the work to be done on the Opportunity Corridor could be leveraged with a little more work to improve transit access to University Circle?
ECTP/Silver Line improves transit access to UC only from the west along the Euclid corridor. I've been trying to advocate for a Shaker Square-UC train connection for a few years. Some track exists, but trying to link up the two districts involves technical obstacles that would take some determined mayors and legislators to break through.