I don't have any problems with dissenting views. But what I always have the most trouble with is — I could summarize it by saying, "whiny people who live in the past." They drive me crazy. Because, there's nothing we can do about the massive changes in our industry...Just whining and moaning about the way it used to be will not solve anything.











Has any thought been given to a bike path on one of the Innerbelt bridges? Now that there will be two bridges with an investment of more than $400 million, it seems that there would be a lot of design flexibility to incorporate a cool bike facility with great views of the Flats and downtown. It could be a special loop route of the Towpath Trail.
In fact, Pittsburgh successfully added a bike/ped lane to an existing bridge and included an ADA-accessible ramp to solve the need for a less steep entrance (see photos at right).
so going by foot will become viable for daily commutes, trips to the ballpark, and even for lunchtime and post-game walks from downtown to Tremont’s many restaurants.
Regrets of No Bicycle/Pedestrian Lanes on I-490
Jeffrey Sugalski Says:November 14, 2009
Mr. Craig Hebebrand
Innerbelt Project Manager
Ohio Department of Transportation
5500 Transportation Boulevard
Garfield Heights, Ohio 44125
Re: Innerbelt Bridge Bicycle/Pedestrian Lanes
Dear Mr. Hebebrand:
I am thoroughly disappointed and dismayed to learn of the Ohio Department of Transportation's continued reluctance to incorporate bicycle/pedestrian lanes into the design of the new Innerbelt Bridge and is poised to make a decision that will be costly to many future generations of Northeast Ohioans and harmful to the vitality of Cleveland.
Bicycle/pedestrian lanes were a vast oversight in the design of Interstate 490 just decades ago, and the dire consequence is that cyclists and pedestrians have no viable option to traverse the Cuyahoga River between the Harvard-Denison and Hope Memorial Bridges.
The result is that persons who prefer bicycles as a means of transportation and households that simply cannot afford a vehicle have been marginalized and are confronted with inequitable access between the city's east and west sides. The incorporation of bicycle/pedestrian lanes into I-490 could have effectively ensured that all individuals, regardless of their form of travel, have a convenient route to the employment and leisure opportunities on the opposing side of the river. Instead, cyclists and pedestrians are unfairly burdened with adversely unreasonable travel lengths through the rugged terrain of the Industrial Valley and commutes more than four times longer than if a specially dedicated path within the I-490 bridge was available.
The shortcomings of Interstate 490 should guide the planning of a new Innerbelt Bridge complete with bicycle/pedestrian lanes. Their omission from I-490 is clearly regretful, and excluding bicycle/pedestrian lanes very similarly from a second major Northeast Ohio highway project will be yet another transportation mistake for many years to come.
I strongly urge you to reconsider your position against the inclusion of multipurpose lanes and stance to deny convenient access between Cleveland's Near West Side and Downtown. Persons who bicycle by choice or out of necessity should not be neglected and are deserving of the same opportunities afforded to motorists. Now is the time to invest in the future of Cleveland, embrace healthy transportation alternatives, provide people of diverse socioeconomic statuses greater access to opportunities, and convey the message that the city and State of Ohio are committed to sustainability.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Sugalski
Cc: Mayor Frank Jackson, City of Cleveland
Robert Brown, Cleveland City Planning Director
Cleveland City Planning Commission Members Anthony Coyne, David Bowen, Joseph Cimperman, Norman Krumholz, Lillian Kuri, Lawrence Lumpkin, Gloria Jean Pinkney
Public health advantages for ped access to Innerbelt Bridge
Kevin Cronin Says:Another important point is that a well conceived and executed Innerbelt Bridge can encourage a lot of healthy activity. If the sights and views are as exciting as the designers suggest, people will enjoy walking or riding across the bridge to work or entertainment on a daily, or even sporadic, basis.
Hundreds of Clevelanders could be encouraged to adopt health activities and walking or biking every day or several days a week or month. There are significant public health advantages to improving walking and bike access to the Innerbelt Bridge. This is an important opportunity for the area.