Bike and pedestrian path on Innerbelt Bridge

Posted in:

  GreenCityBlueLake posed the following question to the Ohio Department of Transportation:

Bike lane on Golden Gate Bridge in San FranciscoHas any thought been given to a bike path on one of the Innerbelt bridges? Now that there will be two bridges with an investment of more than $400 million, it seems that there would be a lot of design flexibility to incorporate a cool bike facility with great views of the Flats and downtown. It could be a special loop route of the Towpath Trail.

Senior officials at ODOT respond that they will study the bike/ped path, but there are issues that need to be resolved. "Not the least of which is how to get cyclists or pedestrians up to and down from the bridge level," says ODOT District 12 manager Craig Hebebrand.

Yet, examples of bike paths on highway bridges (separated by concrete barriers and security fences) exist all over the country. Most recently, Charleston's signature Cooper River Bridge (pictured below) was built with a 12-foot wide bike/pedestrian path. Letters, testimony, and even a local bumper sticker campaign worked to add the bike/ped component into the bridge design, the South Carolina Department of Transportation touts in its public relations. And Charleston Mayor Joseph Riley, Jr., lauded the bike path in his 2007 State of the City address, saying, "A wonderful surprise has been the way our community has taken to the bike and pedestrian lane on the new Cooper River Bridge."

Cooper River Bridge bike/ped path is a popular feature in Charleston, SCThe Innerbelt Bridge crossing is on the City Bikeway Master Plan, Martin Cader at Cleveland City Planning Commission confirms.

"It’s been on there since the bridge issue came up several years ago," he says. "I agree that it would be a great Towpath Trail connection to Jacobs Field/Q-arena/Downtown."

Federal policy suggests that ODOT must accommodate bike/ped travel if they're connecting two streets that are legal for cycling, unless the cost increase is greater than 20 percent of the total project, says former EcoCity Cleveland transportation manager, Ryan McKenzie. "Even if the cost is greater, [ODOT] must invest in more cost-effective alternatives for bikes and pedestrians."

Bike and pedestrian access may work better on the existing bridge, confirms a senior city planner. "This may actually be the better place to do it since there will be extra capacity once the westbound traffic is removed. I see bikes and (pedestrians) on the southern edge of the bridge entering with the W. 14th entrance ramp and exiting at Broadway or Ontario with the exit ramp – it should not be that complicated as they only need to get across the river, not continue beyond the first exit ramp."

Bike/pedestrian path connected to an old bridge in PittsburghIn fact, Pittsburgh successfully added a bike/ped lane to an existing bridge and included an ADA-accessible ramp to solve the need for a less steep entrance (see photos at right).

The federal policy of accommodating new bike/ped amenities in new construction is often overlooked — unless a groundswell of public support drives the process. Make your voice heard for a bike path on the Innerbelt Bridge by emailing ODOT Innerbelt Project Manager Craig Hebebrand or by leaving a comment here.

Reasons for including a bike/pedestrian path on the Innerbelt Bridge

  • Situated in one of the poorest cities in the country, an Innerbelt Bridge Path can add a safer, more affordable transportation option for Clevelanders, and a tangible sign that the region and the state are truly committed to affordable transportation choices. Low income people are already risking their lives to walk the bridge now. Why dismiss their need in a project of this scope, cost and multi-generational importance?
  • Walking distances on the bridge are significantly shorter than alternative routes, An ADA accessible ramp onto the bike/ped path connected to an old bridge in Pittsburghso going by foot will become viable for daily commutes, trips to the ballpark, and even for lunchtime and post-game walks from downtown to Tremont’s many restaurants.
  • The Innerbelt Bridge Path provides an express connection to Jacobs Field and the central business district from the planned Towpath Trail extension, making it a seamless off-road solution for millions of trail visitors each year, as well as daily bicycle commuters from throughout central and southern Cuyahoga County.
  • The Bridge route is free of the steep grade changes and high-volume intersection crossings that make current alternatives such a deterrent to people who would otherwise consider walking and biking into downtown.
  • Our region can offer a quality of life amenity that promotes public health through increased physical activity, decreases household spending by making low-cost commuting more viable, and provides a major recreational and tourism benefit – showcasing views of the downtown skyline and Cuyahoga valley.
  • The Innerbelt Bridge Path is a low-cost, high-impact infrastructure upgrade that will help improve Cleveland’s air quality while reducing our country’s dependence on foreign oil.
  • Hundreds of thousands of people driving over the bridge daily will be educated about sharing the road with cyclists (bike education)

Here's how you can help

Email a letter of support for bike and pedestrian accommodations on the new bridge to:

Recent GCBL coverage
2009
November – "Fighting to make the Innerbelt Bridge a complete street"
April – "A new direction for the Innerbelt"
2008
July 6 – ODOT's response to the bike/pedestrian path on the bridge (pdf 138 KB)
Sept. 28 – EcoCity Cleveland responds to ODOT's opinion to put a bike/ped path on bridge (pdf)
Oct. 5 – ODOT seeks comments on Innerbelt Bridge design types and a bike/ped path by October 20. ODOT is making a final bridge type selection in December 2006.
Oct. 23 – ODOT announces it will delay the entire Innerbelt Project by at least two years to address design problems that impact downtown. ODOT's argument against a bike/ped path are addressed here.
Nov. 20 – ODOT rejects EcoCity Cleveland's call for a better, safer bike/pedestrian accommodation on the Innerbelt Bridge.
Dec. 12 – EcoCity answers with true costs and benefits for well-designed bike/ped path on the Innerbelt Bridge.
2007
Jan. 17 – Bike/ped path on bridge could be "Shortcut to Tremont", Cleveland Free Times.
Jan. 22 – Cleveland Planning Commission support for bike/ped path on bridge, WCPN reports
Jan. 29 – Taft Administration ODOT last letter on bike/ped accommodation on the bridge
March 6 – Ohio City Bike CoOp letter in support of bike/ped path on Innerbelt Bridge.

Resources

November 17, 2009 - 6:05pm

Regrets of No Bicycle/Pedestrian Lanes on I-490

Jeffrey Sugalski Says:

November 14, 2009

Mr. Craig Hebebrand
Innerbelt Project Manager
Ohio Department of Transportation
5500 Transportation Boulevard
Garfield Heights, Ohio 44125

Re: Innerbelt Bridge Bicycle/Pedestrian Lanes

Dear Mr. Hebebrand:

I am thoroughly disappointed and dismayed to learn of the Ohio Department of Transportation's continued reluctance to incorporate bicycle/pedestrian lanes into the design of the new Innerbelt Bridge and is poised to make a decision that will be costly to many future generations of Northeast Ohioans and harmful to the vitality of Cleveland.

Bicycle/pedestrian lanes were a vast oversight in the design of Interstate 490 just decades ago, and the dire consequence is that cyclists and pedestrians have no viable option to traverse the Cuyahoga River between the Harvard-Denison and Hope Memorial Bridges.

The result is that persons who prefer bicycles as a means of transportation and households that simply cannot afford a vehicle have been marginalized and are confronted with inequitable access between the city's east and west sides. The incorporation of bicycle/pedestrian lanes into I-490 could have effectively ensured that all individuals, regardless of their form of travel, have a convenient route to the employment and leisure opportunities on the opposing side of the river. Instead, cyclists and pedestrians are unfairly burdened with adversely unreasonable travel lengths through the rugged terrain of the Industrial Valley and commutes more than four times longer than if a specially dedicated path within the I-490 bridge was available.

The shortcomings of Interstate 490 should guide the planning of a new Innerbelt Bridge complete with bicycle/pedestrian lanes. Their omission from I-490 is clearly regretful, and excluding bicycle/pedestrian lanes very similarly from a second major Northeast Ohio highway project will be yet another transportation mistake for many years to come.

I strongly urge you to reconsider your position against the inclusion of multipurpose lanes and stance to deny convenient access between Cleveland's Near West Side and Downtown.  Persons who bicycle by choice or out of necessity should not be neglected and are deserving of the same opportunities afforded to motorists. Now is the time to invest in the future of Cleveland, embrace healthy transportation alternatives, provide people of diverse socioeconomic statuses greater access to opportunities, and convey the message that the city and State of Ohio are committed to sustainability.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Sugalski

Cc: Mayor Frank Jackson, City of Cleveland
Robert Brown, Cleveland City Planning Director
Cleveland City Planning Commission Members Anthony Coyne, David Bowen, Joseph Cimperman, Norman Krumholz, Lillian Kuri, Lawrence Lumpkin, Gloria Jean Pinkney

November 2, 2006 - 10:09pm

Public health advantages for ped access to Innerbelt Bridge

Kevin Cronin Says:

Another important point is that a well conceived and executed Innerbelt Bridge can encourage a lot of healthy activity.  If the sights and views are as exciting as the designers suggest, people will enjoy walking or riding across the bridge to work or entertainment on a daily, or even sporadic, basis.

Hundreds of Clevelanders could be encouraged to adopt health activities and walking or biking every day or several days a week or month.  There are significant public health advantages to improving walking and bike access to the Innerbelt Bridge. This is an important opportunity for the area.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.