Transit

Ride RTA and take a stand against high gas pricesAn essential part of a balanced transportation system

In our automobile culture, transit gets little respect, but it's a vital part of a healthy, sustainable city. In Northeast Ohio, cities haven't come close to realizing the promise of transit — especially at a time of rising gasoline costs when people need affordable transportation choices.

This section will tell the story of the region's transit challenges. What would you like to see?

Local resources

National resources

January 6, 2008 - 9:09pm

Cedar-University station

curatorius Says:

Cleveland has a world-class amenity in the fact that we can ride from University Circle, through Tower City, out to the Airport without getting up from our seat on the Red Line.
And yet this is underused by the CWRU community, and I think this has to do with the fact that, while it is not all that far from the station to Adelbert Road, it's an unmarked and underlit distance.
I have been saying for several years that a low-tech, non-energy-intensive fix for this might be to build a pedestrian bridge from the station across the tracks that would come out over near Veale Center. While this new crossing of the tracks would only be a few hundred meters from Adelbert bridge, it would reduce the walking time to the Case campus by several minutes and make it feel more like a "CWRU Rapid stop" rather than a "Cedar Ave. Rapid stop that's a dreary 15 minute walk from your final destination". With good design and lighting it would feel safer than the current walk.
I wrote to Chris Ronayne of UCI and Pat Britt of Cleveland City Council about this in recent years, and I'm hoping to get replies to this post about what's in the works in the master plans for the station that I know RTA has in the pipeline.

January 7, 2008 - 10:57am

Cedar-University station planning underway

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

Mike,

RTA recently held public meetings to get the ball rolling on the redevelopment of the Cedar-University Rapid Station and, hopefully, improve the access to and from the area. One of the big topics was how to improve access and visibility to University Circle. RTA floated the idea of a new entrance from the Carnegie/MLK side just west of the tracks to create a visible gateway from University Circle. In fact, they discussed the possibility of up to three entrances to the station. They discussed improving the pedestrian bridge to the University Hospital medical campus (to improve the perception of safety since it's a little below grade of the parking lot there at Murray Hill and Adelbert and next to a fence). They also discussed improving the conditions of the underpass on Cedar Hill. Comments included the need to improve on the human touches such as signage, wayfinding, lighting and even publicity for transit connections like the shuttle bus run by Cleveland Clinic. There was some talk about combining East Blvd. and Stearns into one boulevard, but for my money, I would work on improving the access into the campus from Euclid/Stokes for pedestrians who want to access the Rapid station via a highly visible route (right now, Euclid is clogged up with surface parking with no logical way to walk from the Rapid to the campus from the west. If a new entrance is added west of the tracks, it will be particularly important to improve the pedestrian experience for Case/UH, Clinic, School of the Arts, etc. Then, you really create a nice district and park area instead of a dead zone between UH and the Clinic.) The Cedar-University station will be completely torn down and rebuilt. Bids for construction will go out later this year ('08), and construction will begin in spring '09, and is expected to last two years. RTA's design consultants are currently working on a master plan that enhances the economic development and pedestrian flow in the area.

January 7, 2008 - 1:15pm

Great! Access during construction?

curatorius Says:

Great! Sounds like they're aware of the issues I've raised.
When they tear the station down, will they build a temporary station for access during the reconstruction? I only bring it up because I think I recall RTA shut down the W.65th station while it was being rebuilt.

January 7, 2008 - 2:40pm

Open during construction

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

My understanding is the station will remain open during reconstruction, and that's why it will take two years to build (but you might want to confirm that with RTA).

June 10, 2007 - 2:46pm

Shaker-Circle rail link?

curatorius Says:

Conrail is the current owner of some track that would conceivably provide a link between the Shaker rapid lines and the Red Line considerably to the east of their current nexus at E. 55th. Creating a spur along this track could enable RTA to provide a one-seat express train between Shaker Square and the University/Cedar stop. It's clear to me that this could make transit riders of quite a few CWRU faculty and staff, but its potential utility would be broader that that, I think. The biggest problem is that the right-of-way is too narrow for freight and passenger rail to run on it safely simultaneously. But RTA's Transit 2025 master plan allows as how some of the region's freight track may become 'surplus' in  coming years. If Conrail ever became willing to sell this track to RTA, this idea would become feasible. Investing in this proposal would be a re-investment in existing infrastructure in an already-urbanized part of the region, unlike building new track to the exurbs.

June 11, 2007 - 11:16am

Or a rails-to-trails link?

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

What do you think about the possibility of converting a line like that to a bike trail? With the Heights Circulator now splitting its route in two including a dedicated leg that shuttles between Shaker Square and Coventry (with connections to the University Circle Red Line station), it seems to me that surface streets take care of the train connection. What we need more of, in my opinion, are safer bike boulevards and paths. Do you have a map of where this rail line runs? Could a Rails to Trails initiative on the Conrail line link up with Shaker Heights' planning department's desire to build an off-road bike path in the vicinity of North Park?

June 11, 2007 - 4:26pm

Conrail track

curatorius Says:

Well, that Shaker-Coventry circulator leg doesn't appear to be very highly used and I worry about its long-term prospects. I think there's a large demographic of people who commute between Shaker Heights and University Circle that could best be tapped by a one-seat, or at least a two-seat but all-rail, transit connection. Keep in mind, of course, that I don't have any information that suggests that Conrail is anywhere near giving up this track. But here is the map of where the track is - this map is pretty much centered on the midpoint of the section I'm talking about.

June 11, 2007 - 4:28pm

that shorter segment to the west

curatorius Says:

might be useful too, all of this assuming that the track becomes available. Maybe one day we could have a transit spur and a rail-to-trail both.

June 12, 2007 - 9:41am

More a Forgotten Triangle loop

Marc Lefkowitz Says:

I see where the Conrail line runs, but it doesn't look like it connects Shaker Square to University Circle (am I not looking at the right line?). It looks more like a loop into the "Forgotten Triangle". Maybe someday it could be a rails-to-trails link or planned as part of the "Opportunity Corridor" (if NOACA wanted to show a commitment to multi-modal transportation). Do you know how many trains per day Conrail runs on that line?

Are you sure the Shaker Square to Coventry leg of the Circulator isn't performing well? As you know since we both ride it, the Coventry to University Circle leg seems to be well used.

June 13, 2007 - 2:51pm

a connector

curatorius Says:

Though my Conrail track does not go all the way to University Circle, it intersects track that does and I'm thinking of it as a connector that trains would switch onto and back off of.

It's true that anyone who wants to ride RTA from Shaker to Case already can by connecting to the 48s or the Circulators. But I've met a lot of people who say they are much more inclined to use transit when they can use an all-rail trip, preferably without getting out of their seat to change vehicles, rather than connecting with buses. This might be unjustified, but it's common and it is true that buses get off schedule a lot more than trains do. I think that my proposal is premised on a belief that providing better transit is the best way to get Cleveland commuters out of their cars, whereas your message above is premised on the idea that safer biking routes are the most effective way to reduce the local "modal share" of the solo auto. Of course, we need both in an ideal world. Perhaps since we already arguably have adequate/tolerable transit but lack tolerable bike facilities, we need to bring the bikability up to snuff to be *balanced*?

I don't have any hard data on the Circulator routes. Do you? I would bet you a cup of coffee that you'd find that the Euclid Heights-Egdehill-Cornell leg is a LOT healthier than the Shaker-Coventry route - the good news being that the Circle leg is clearly quite healthy.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.