Blog › Air of anxiety over Cleveland's waste-to-energy plant


Air of anxiety over Cleveland's waste-to-energy plant

Marc Lefkowitz  |  04/10/13 @ 12:00pm  |  Posted in Stuff

Concerns about pollution released from a proposed plant that will melt plastic, and possibly tires and medical waste at E. 79th and St. Clair turned out a vocal group of residents of Cleveland's east side last night.

Air apparent<br />Vadxx Electric CEO Jim Garrett explains his company's process of melting plastic and tires at a proposed plant on Cleveland's east side. Vadxx marks the spot<br />Akron-based company Vadxx Electric proposes to build a $70 million facility at E. 79th and St. Clair that melts plastic and tires in to crude oil.Reducing waste?<br />Vadxx presented this sample of post-consumer plastic (#1-7) that will be melted at their proposed east side Cleveland plant.

Akron-based Vadxx Electric already has Ohio EPA’s approval to melt materials down to crude oil and annually emit 22 tons of carbon monoxide, 5 tons of nitrous oxide, 0.9 tons of particulates (soot), 5 tons of volatile organic compounds, and 1.3 to the negative 5 cubic meters of dioxin at the Cleveland site.

It led to a barrage of questions about the effects to human health from air pollutants known and undisclosed.

Where does the plume travel? South Euclid Councilman Marty Gelfand wondered.

Company officials said there should be little cause for concern. First, OEPA classified their operation as a minor emitter—or less than 100 tons of pollution per year. The process of melting in a closed vessel captures most of the pollution, they add. And a scrubber on their smoke stack will catch most of the rest, they said. They don’t anticipate emitting serious carcinogens found in plastic such as dioxin.

They compare their smoke stack to a chimney at home for a hot water tank.

That’s an unfair characterization, says former Cleveland Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer, Larry Cornett.

“Carcinogenic pollutants are not in the same matrix of pollutants as a gas boiler,” Cornett said. “I’ve seen many syn(thetic) fuel facilities that have scaled up and failed and had to have emergency releases.”

Vadxx assured, their process is safe. In the last five years, Vadxx developed the technology at their R&D facility in Akron. They were admitted to a NASA tech incubator, and secured $1.5 million from Rockwell Automation, a major engineering firm based in Cleveland. Working with a team of engineers from Rockwell, the company scaled up its pilot to 350 times its size in order to demonstrate its ability to operate at production scale. The Cleveland plant would be a 50:1 scale up from their pilot.

While company officials claim they will not melt tires and medical waste, environmental groups and residents are concerned because their air pollution permit allows them to do so.

“We would like something in writing,” said a woman who identified herself as a neighborhood resident. “This is wishful thinking until you put it down on paper. We would hope you’d have another forum that documents the emissions.”

Jim Braun, the Cleveland Division of Air Quality staffer who reviewed the company’s air permit, said a public notice of the draft permit was released in September, 2012. It received no comments. He added that his division would test the plume when the facility comes online to confirm the company accounted for all the pollutants.

The gap between no comments and the evening’s outpouring of concern led to questions about the effectiveness of the public notification system.

“I think that we need to take a step back,” said Gelfand, who was legal counsel for Rep. Dennis Kucinich for more than a decade.

Others voiced concerns about the proximity to homes and to Michael R. White elementary school.

Cleveland Director of Economic Development Tracey Nichols noted that 250 permits for minor emitters were granted in Cuyahoga County in the last 24 months. Vadxx CEO Jim Garrett added that, “minor emitters are all around us. From hospitals to dry cleaners.”

A resident responded to Ms. Nichols with a question: “Would you want this in your neighborhood?”

“I’m a resident of Cleveland, too,” Nichols said, “and yes, I would.”

“Vadxx wants to be a good neighbor,” Garrett added. “We want to bring international attention to Cleveland.”

The plant would add 17 jobs, and an undisclosed amount of back office staff. Garrett expects the back office staff to grow as they sell the Vadxx technology to other cities. While the technology, known as pyrolysis, is relatively new to the U.S., operations in the U.K and Ireland rely on it to produce crude oil for sale. Vadxx has signed contracts with oil refiners in Houston for the oil produced in Cleveland, he said.

Cleveland councilman Jeff Johnson managed to strike a balance between hearing concerns and supporting the plant. At one point, he gave voice to the mounting frustration over the cost-benefit of 17 new jobs and a new source of pollution.

“I bet if this was more like 117 jobs we might feel better about this,” he said.

Akshai Singh of Sierra Club voiced concern about high incidents of asthma among children in the area which is also very close to a now-mothballed CPP coal-fired power plant at E. 72nd and the Shoreway.

Local activist Susan Miller also wondered how sustainable is a system that “seems to have no limit to the air pollution permits it will grant. Meanwhile, Cuyahoga County is in non-compliance with federal air quality standards and you’re crying about that. This is death valley.”

Johnson promised to investigate all of the concerns voiced at the meeting. “The focus is the pollution. Is this 22 tons acceptable to you? Is this something that folks want?”

  • Comments
  • Print

Leave a comment »

Jamie Kaminski
5 years ago

Kevin Cronin, you are asking all the right quesitons... Keep it up and don't take I'll get back to you as an answer.

Someone is making money from selling all that pollution and it isn't going to be the people inhaling it.

A question to ask is, why do they feel they need to burn this waste? Tires can be ground-up into crumb rubber for various applications, and most of what will be going into that burner will most likely be recyclable, reusable, repairable, or compostable which would create far more jobs than the 17 proposed... If Clevland decided to handle their waste more responsibly... www.zerowastecanada.ca www.zwia.org

Kevin Cronin
5 years ago

At one point, Cleveland development staff said the City had approved 250 low level emissions permits over the past two years. I would be very interested to know the total level of emissions and categories of emissions approved under those permits. Even a low level of emission, when multiplied by a 250 individual permits, is significant. We are already not meeting clean air standards. The approval of "low level" emission permits on a large scale could provide for the release of high, but "accepted," levels of emissions for CO, particulates and other pollutants. Are the total amount of "permitted" pollutants aggregated and monitored anywhere? Either way, it seems to be a step back from clean air and public health standards.

Kevin Cronin
5 years ago

I was pleased the public questions portion raised the general issues of public health. As this region already fails to meet clean air standards, the issues of releasing more CO, particulates and other pollutants into the atmosphere will impact public health, including asthma for kids, stroke and heart disease for working adults.

Filter by RSS

Social media feed

The best bike trails

The best bike trails >

Find out where are the most interesting bike rides in Northeast Ohio

Ten water saving tips

Ten water saving tips >

We're at the shore of Lake Erie, but we still have good reasons to conserve

Eco-friendly landscapes

Eco-friendly landscapes >

We look inside two local guides to native landscaping and their benefits.